The Hidden Cost of In-House Operations for Fintech Startups — and How BPO Fixes It

The fintech industry has become one of the most demanding sectors in tech, and for good reason: it generates hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue every year. In 2025 alone, the global fintech market generated approximately $650 billion in revenue — a roughly 21% jump from 2024. That growth followed several turbulent years marked by declining investment, compressed valuations, and mounting pressure on fintech companies to finally prove they can turn a profit, not just grow fast.

As a result, a growing number of fintech startups have turned to BPO providers to soften the impact on their business. In the first quarter of 2026, U.S. fintechs raised $11.1 billion across 466 deals — a 16% increase in funding and a 33% rise in deal count compared to the same quarter the year before. Encouraging numbers, yes. But the current fintech funding environment still sits well below where it stood roughly six years ago, at the height of the 2021 boom.

The fintech boom that built the industry

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered a sudden shift in how people and businesses handled money. Restrictions on physical interaction kept customers away from bank branches, and that alone accelerated digital adoption across banking, payments, lending, and remittances — the exact areas where fintech companies operate.

At the same time, governments moved to help their economies absorb the shock. The U.S. Federal Reserve, for example, cut interest rates to near zero to support the economy during the early stages of the crisis. That made borrowing cheaper and kept credit flowing to businesses, households, and financial institutions.

With cheap capital available and digital finance suddenly essential, investors became far more willing to back fintech companies capable of growing exponentially. That created a genuinely favorable environment for fintech startups to launch and scale. During this stage, companies were judged almost entirely on their ability to execute aggressive growth — acquiring more users, processing more transactions, entering more markets, closing larger funding rounds, and pushing valuations up as quickly as possible.

But the easing of the pandemic also meant the end of that near-paradise environment. A series of events pushed the industry into what the Fintech Times would later describe as the "fintech winter."

The fintech winter that reshaped it

The fintech winter followed directly on the heels of the 2020–2021 boom, as several pressures reshaped the industry almost at once. The Federal Reserve began raising interest rates in March 2022, making capital more expensive and pushing investors toward safer assets. At the same time, falling venture funding forced investors to reassess inflated valuations — leading to down rounds, write-downs, and sharp public-market declines. Fintech companies were suddenly judged less on rapid expansion and more on a credible, near-term path to profitability.

Trust in the sector also took a hit after the collapse of FTX in November 2022, which raised serious concerns about governance and the protection of customer funds — particularly across crypto-adjacent platforms. Together, these events created a far more demanding operating environment, one in which funding became harder to secure and growth came under much closer scrutiny. Fintech startups were forced to manage their runway more carefully, strengthen their operations, and pursue innovation without losing sight of profitability.

What's actually eating a startup's runway

Following the fintech winter, it became clear that many fintech startups had scaled their customer bases faster than their operating models. During the boom, abundant capital let startups expand despite weak unit economics and high operating costs. Once funding became harder to secure, those weaknesses became much harder to sustain. Startups had to reduce burn while still running full in-house operations, extend their runway, and demonstrate a credible path to profitability — all while investors grew increasingly cautious.

A fintech startup's runway refers to the number of months it can keep operating before exhausting its available cash at its current rate of spending. That runway is consumed, month after month, by a small set of essential in-house operating costs:

Together, these four expenditures place constant pressure on startups to balance growth, regulatory responsibility, service quality, and the careful use of limited capital. This is where BPO providers start to matter.

Customer service as trust infrastructure

Customer service is a significant draw on a fintech startup's runway. While fintech-specific cost structures vary widely, private B2B SaaS benchmarks place median customer support and customer success spending at approximately 9% of annual recurring revenue — a directional benchmark rather than a universal fintech standard, but a useful one. It suggests customer service is more than a line-item operating expense. It functions as the medium between a company and its customers, especially in the moments when a financial transaction fails or becomes difficult to understand.

The remaining question for most founders is how a fintech startup can protect its runway while still delivering quality customer service. For startups facing rising support volumes and limited hiring capacity because of runway discipline, outsourcing selected customer service functions to a BPO partner that already understands fintech can create a far more scalable operating model.If you want to learn more about how BPO can reduce the burn rate of your current runway, visit our previous blog that lets you calculate outsourcing cost with ease: Outsourcing Cost Calculators.

CTNP as a fintech BPO partner

CTNP has been supporting fintech startups looking to extend their runway without compromising service quality for over 31 years. For a startup with limited runway, the goal is never to cut customer service indiscriminately. The goal is to build a support model that controls cost while preserving accuracy, responsiveness, and human judgment in the cases that matter most. Customer service in fintech can look like simple, routine tasks — answering questions, KYC back-office support, resolving transaction issues — but solving or de-escalating an issue involving someone's money is a genuinely complex endeavor that requires experienced agents to handle well.

At CTNP, we combine structured fintech customer support operations with experienced agents who manage routine inquiries, account verification, fraud-related escalations, and chargeback cases with care and precision. In financial services, inaccurate or inaccessible support leads directly to customer frustration, because the stakes always involve someone's money. We understand the weight of resolving concerns clearly, coordinating with operations and compliance teams, and catching recurring problems before they damage customer trust. That's why our agents are trained on the service philosophy of Omotenashi and Malasakit — anticipating customer needs, de-escalating sensitive situations, and protecting trust in every outsourced fintech interaction.

We believe in the importance of genuine human interaction in every transaction. Fintech companies resolve issues involving their customers' hard-earned money — it's only fitting that they pair the security of that transaction with service built on human empathy and sincerity. We are committed to staying away from the automated, cold responses that purely AI-driven agents tend to produce.

That doesn't mean we ignore what AI can do well. We integrate AI into our workflows to help agents make the right decision on every call — enhancing customer service rather than replacing it. If you want to read more about how AI fits into our operations, our earlier post on why AI-first customer service is quietly failing digs into that in more detail.

For fintech startups trying to extend their runway, outsourcing selected customer support operations to a BPO partner that understands the space can provide a more scalable, cost-efficient model — while allowing internal teams to stay focused on product development, regulatory priorities, and long-term growth.

Frequently asked questions